sisaac9的部落格

Many kinship group especially environmentalists wish to rupture feathers background to hinder Climate Change and yet in doing so they would fashion human societies so tender that they could not coping beside the repercussions of too hot and later too stone-cold after the climate formation hits the tipping ingredient.

We obligation to talk almost solutions to Global Warming, Climate Change or Climate Crisis or what of all time you decision to hail as it short inculpatory every person and starting the global infernal games. Recently one associate of a judge armored vehicle said;

I concur that a measureless hang over to equilibrium the planet victimisation icebergs and towing them into place; cleanup the atmosphere, surroundings up an omission protective covering in Geo-sync, concealment CO2 in intuitive gas cavities, using CO2 optical maser practical application to make power, hurtling to a h reduction and umpteen another specified holding could aid a lot. But I see few if any proposals on tap, in certainty I see physiological state of specified technologies by governments, special interests and specified.

Yes, I see the adverse affects of droughts bloodshed lets say 2.2 a billion culture due to denial of binary compound and not adequate incident to physique desalinisation undergrowth. But so I see the gift of opposite holding instead of setting up. Climate Changes happen, yes of course, they always have and it is in the ice middle records, earth science and ligneous plant trucks to few degree. Yes we cognize all that.

Can man conclusion environmental condition changes or do a \\"noise canceling strategy\\" on the peaks or exacerbated apparatus swings? Perhaps so, does that manufacture sense? What is the cost? What is the cost if we do, or don\\'t to the done all flows of the civilization? Will that activity human civilizations or hurt them?

We would have accrued inflation, slaughter some economies and symptom large indefinite amount who correct now in performance on less than a $1 a day as per Davos speeches this period of time. I have issues; I like nuclear, hydro, ocean moving ridge say-so generation, caloric earth power, unspotted coal, hydrogen makes knowingness too. I have no dilemma beside any of it.

We do obligation improved batteries and what do we do beside all the old batteries if 200 cardinal cars in America hit the junkyards in the adjacent 50 years? Decay, soiled water? Well if we don\\'t you could say we have red tide, alga blooms, more bacteria, dead fish (already all over fished oceans) and slain zones 550 plus miles from human built-up shorelines or watercourse mouths, yes all issues. But motility down civilizations will not slog either. So, else policy and philosophy should be greeting and be thoughtful. You think?

Perhaps it is instance to re-visit this premise but focusing on the end end and exterior for solutions and not kick up your heels diplomatic indict games or go and dive big industries or our system product. I prospect this nonfictional prose propels scheme in 2007.